Manny Pacquiao and wife Jinkee —Photo from Manny Pacquiao Facebook page

MANILA, Philippines — Former senator and boxing icon Manny Pacquiao and his wife Jinkee had their victory affirmed by the court in connection with a P2.26-billion tax case.

The Court of Tax Appeals (CTA) has affirmed its decision dismissing the case arising from the couple’s alleged deficiencies in 2008 and 2009.

Article continues after this advertisement

A 68-page en banc decision, which was promulgated on Jan. 23, denied for lack of merit the petition for review filed by the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) to seek a reversal of the 2022 decision and the 2023 resolution that both went in favor of the Pacquiaos.

FEATURED STORIES NEWSINFO Court affirms Pacquiaos’ win in P2.2-B tax case NEWSINFO What, no Senate? House execs say of budget raps NEWSINFO Admin-backed Senate slate to kick off campaign in Marcos’ bailiwick

READ: Tax court junks gov’t appeal to reverse favorable ruling on P2.2 B Pacquiao tax case

The case stemmed from the BIR’s income tax assessment that found the couple having P2.26 billion in allegedly “underdeclared” income, as well as value-added tax (VAT) on local income that they allegedly left unpaid for the years 2008 and 2009.

Article continues after this advertisement

The assessment, which was part of the BIR’s Run after Tax Evaders (RATE) program, broke down the deficiency income tax totaling P2,229,020,905 and the undeclared VAT worth P32,197,134 during the period.

Article continues after this advertisement No due process

At the time, Pacquiao was at the height of his boxing career, having defeated other ring legends, namely Miguel Cotto of Puerto Rico and former world champion Oscar De La Hoya.

Article continues after this advertisement

But according to the CTA en banc, citing the BIR’s Revenue Regulations, the income tax assessment was void due to a violation of the respondents’ right to due process and the bureau’s failure to inform the Pacquiaos about the basis for a tax assessment.

“The taxpayer must be informed in writing of any discrepancies and be given the opportunity to explain and present evidence in an informal conference. This requirement ensures that taxpayers can clarify or contest the assessments before a formal demand is issued,” the court said, adding:

Touting it as an energy-efficient and smart public transportation system, the three held on Tuesday a ribbon cutting ceremony and demonstration of the service inside the New Clark City, Clark Freeport Zone, and Clark International Airport.

The decisions give a boost to the bloc’s outgoing competition chief, Margrethe Vestager, who had suffered a series of setbacks in EU courts against her decisions.

Article continues after this advertisement

“There is no evidence to show that [the Pacquiaos] were given an opportunity to participate in an informal conference as required under the cited regulation.”

The tax court also noted that the BIR’s formal letter of demand did not provide sufficient explanation on how it came up with the couple’s supposed gross income.

The BIR notice also failed to furnish the respondents with copies of documents, such as newspaper clippings and articles, as basis for the assessment, it added.

“It is well-established that tax assessments must clearly inform taxpayers of both the factual and legal bases of the assessment to satisfy due process requirements,” it said. “The Supreme Court has consistently held that the absence of such clarity and specificity in the assessment notice constitutes a violation of the taxpayer’s right to due process.”

Lack of legal basis

The tax court also disagreed with the BIR’s argument that the tax assessment it initiated was grounded in fact and in law. It took note of court records showing that the agency relied on newspaper clippings “without independent verification of the reported figures.”

“There being no reversible error, the court en banc finds no cogent reason or justification to disturb the conclusions reached by the Special Third Division.”

best online slots

It was referring to the September 2022 ruling of the CTA Special Third Division that nullified the income tax assessment for “lack of sufficient basis.”

The en banc decision was written by Associate Justice Jean Marie Bacorro-Villena.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again. Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

SIGN ME UP

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Except for Associate Justice Catherine Manahan who dissentedw500, and Associate Justice Henry Angeles who was on leave, the decision had the concurrence of Presiding Justice Roman del Rosario and the rest of the CTA justices.

READ NEXT NUJP hits CamSur bet who cried ‘fake news’ after losing in... LTO revokes license of ‘Superman stunt’ rider EDITORS' PICK Pangilinan on being 15th in Senate race survey: ‘We have to beg for votes’ Suspect in cold case murder of Filipina in Toronto arrested after 26 years PCG: How can world back West PH Sea term if we undermine it? Cloudy skies, rain expected in NCR, 12 other areas due to northeast monsoon Start of campaign period: Things you need to know PH, Cambodia ink pacts on taxation, agri, tourism, culture MOST READ Retired PNPA alumni free to back VP following House impeachment Court affirms Pacquiaos’ win in P2.2-B tax case Marcos slams Duterte, but bets avoid ‘VP trial’ talk PCG: How can world back West PH Sea term if we undermine it? Follow @FMangosingINQ on Twitter --> View comments